Change ,
Back to Customer Insights

Natural Gas: What’s in store for 2018.

April 25, 2018

April 2018 Edition: Natural Gas: What’s in store for 2018. 

In this edition we’ll review several key factors that influence natural gas prices; weather, storage inventories, and market demand. Read this edition to learn more about these fundamentals and how their outlooks affect forward natural gas prices.


If you’re in charge of purchasing energy for your business, you know how important it is to stay on top of energy trends. In this article, we’ll take a look at the specific demand drivers of natural gas and how these may impact natural gas prices this summer. There are several key factors that influence natural gas demand:  weather, storage inventories, and market demand. We will discuss each of these fundamentals and how their outlooks affect forward natural gas prices.

Weather

The first, and arguably most important driver of natural gas prices is weather. Natural gas demand is driven by the need to either heat or cool commercial, industrial or residential structures when temperatures are at extremes. Weather by its nature is the most challenging to forecast. Ironically, weather is also the largest driver of demand, and therefore, probably has the most direct, real-time impact on natural
gas prices.

Weather forecasts beyond three to five days are subject to high degrees of uncertainty. For this reason, many long-term forecasts focus on trends that may influence future temperatures. Recently, the National Weather Service provided its long-term outlook for the period of April 2018 through March 2019, which projects a high probability of above normal temperatures for much of the United States. Exceptions to that forecast are seen in the Central and Northern Plains and the Pacific Northwest as these regions are forecasted to experience an equal chance of above, below, or normal temperatures. The very generic nature of that forecast speaks to the lack of clarity and actionable information provided by long-term weather forecasts.

Storage

Another important market fundamental that influences natural gas pricing is storage inventories. Natural gas storage inventories are highly correlated to weather. In winter months, natural gas inventories decrease significantly during periods of extreme cold. Each Thursday morning, the EIA reports week-ending storage inventory levels along with comparisons against inventories at the same time in the prior year, and, the five-year average.

Natural gas prices react real-time to the Thursday storage report as market participants interpret how storage levels may impact demand going forward. For instance, during a week of heavy storage withdrawal, prices tend to go up as less supply is available to get through the peak demand season. Less natural gas available to pull from storage means a greater need for natural gas purchases and deliveries during periods of sustained cold. Below find an example of a weekly storage report published by the EIA.

From a historical perspective, natural gas supply outpaces demand in the months of April through October and lags behind demand in the months of November through March. Because of this seasonal supply, storage plays an important role in keeping the natural gas market balanced. With the calendar just about to flip to the traditional injection season, it is expected that natural gas will end the winter withdrawal season with approximately 1,340 billion cubic feet (Bcf) in storage. The current expected inventory trough of 1,340 Bcf is approximately 720 Bcf lower than levels from early April 2017. This is a product of a current winter that has been much cooler than the extremely mild winter of 2016 – 2017. This level also is approximately 370 Bcf lower than average inventory levels for early April over the past five years.

The five-year average for inventory levels at the end of the injection season is 3,848 Bcf. The benchmark for a generally accepted comfortable injection season ending storage is 4,000 Bcf. Therefore, the market needs to inject 2,508 Bdf over the summer months to reach the five-year average level by the end of October 2018 and 2,660 Bcf to get to hit the 4,000 Bcf benchmark. The increased demand required to make up for lagging storage inventories represents approximately 370 Bcf in incremental demand during the 2018 summer and storage injection season. That represents roughly 3.08 Bcf in increased daily demand.

Market Demand

Two areas that have had a dramatic impact on natural gas demand over the past several years have been the continued growth of natural gas as an input for power generation and the exporting of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the Gulf Coast and Mid-Atlantic regions of the U.S. It is expected that the upcoming summer will see over 7,000 MW of coal-fired power removed from the nation’s portfolio of electric generation. Natural gas fired generation is expected to replace much of that supply. The anticipated increase in natural gas fired generation is expected to produce a 2.5 Bcf per day increase in natural gas demand during the summer of 2018. LNG exports have also continued to ramp up over the past year from both increased operations at the Sabine Pass terminal in Louisiana and the commissioning of the Cove Point facility in Southern Maryland in March of 2018. Increased operations at these two facilities are expected to increase demand for natural gas by approximately 1.5 Bcf per day.

Increased LNG exports, expansion in the United States’ natural gas generation fleet and making up for lagging storage inventories will combine to create an increased demand for natural gas this summer in a range of 5.7 to 7.08 Bcf per day. Daily demand for natural gas was approximately 74 Bcf per day throughout 2017. The anticipated increase in demand for the summer of 2018, represents additional daily natural gas load of roughly 7.5 – 9.5 % when compared against 2017 demand.

Year to date, production volumes in the U.S. have averaged approximately 6 Bcf per day higher than volumes in 2017 so the market should have ample supply despite the increase in demand. However, as the supply and demand factors fluctuate throughout 2018, forward prices will react accordingly. Those movements in natural gas prices will flow through to impact power prices as natural gas and power prices are highly correlated.

At AEP Energy we have the resources to keep you informed with conditions affecting your energy prices. Are you on the right path? Contact us today to develop your energy strategy.


Market Overview – AEP Energy Trading

Natural Gas

  • During the month of March, natural gas and power prices
    were able to push higher throughout the curve as a result of
    persistently below normal weather for much of the eastern
    half of the country.
  • Prompt month (April 2018) natural gas at Henry Hub moved up
    $0.066/MMBtu to close at $2.733/MMBtu.
  • Balance of the year (May – December 2018) was up slightly by
    $0.050/MMBtu to $2.846/MMBtu.
  • Beyond that, Calendar 2019 was up $0.014/MMBtu to
    $2.791/MMBtu, and Calendar 2020 down $0.023/MMBtu
    to $2.775/MMBtu.

Power PJM – Ohio

  • April 2018 AEP – Dayton Hub peak power jumped up
    $2.15/MWh to settle at $35.50/MWh.
  • May 2018 AEP – Dayton Hub peak power was up $1.25/MWh
    to $35.40/MWh.
  • Balance of the year (May – December 2018) climbed
    $0.75/MWh to $35.47/MWh.
  • In the calendar years, 2019 increased $0.69/MWh to
    $34.69/MWh and 2020 increased $0.65/MWh to
    $34.37/MWh.

Power Illinois

  • PJM ComEd zone March 2018 day-ahead peak power closed
    $28.22/MWh, climbing $1.47/MWh from February’s close.
  • MISO Illinois.Hub March 2018 day-ahead peak power closed
    $26.56/MWh, up slightly by $0.08/MWh from
    February’s close.

Power MISO

  • FERC approved the request of MISO Transmission Owners’
    who have forward-looking transmission formula rates, revising
    their rates to reflect the tax changes effective back to January
    1, 2018. The tax change reflects the reduced tax rate of 21%
    down from 35% as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
  • The affected MISO Transmission Owners with forward-
    looking transmission rate formulas filed a waiver request
    with FERC to allow revisions to their 2018 projected net
    revenue requirements reflecting the new federal corporate
    tax rate.
  • Without the waiver, transmission owners would not have
    been able to implement the new federal tax rate until 2019,
    requiring a true-up for 2018, which in turn, customers would
    see in 2020 transmission rates.
  • MISO expects to implement revised transmission rates during
    March 2018 and re-bill transmission rates for January and
    March 2018.

Any references made to prompt month natural gas will normally be associated with a range starting the first day of the month through the final settlement of the respective prompt month natural gas contract. Other references to forward natural gas prices and all power prices will be based on a range starting the first day of the month through the final day of the month.

AEP Energy does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, freedom from error, or value of any information herein. The information presented is provided “as is”, “as available”, and for informational purposes only, speaks only to events or circumstances on or before the date it is presented, and should not be construed as advice, a recommendation, or a guarantee of future results. AEP Energy disclaims any and all liabilities and warranties related hereto, including any obligation to update or correct the information herein. Summaries and website links included herein (collectively, “Links”) are not under AEP Energy’s control and are provided for reference only and not for commercial purposes. AEP Energy does not endorse or approve of the Links or related information and does not provide any warranty of any kind or nature related thereto. Forward-looking statements contained herein are based on forecasted or outlook information (including assumptions and estimations) but any such statements may be influenced by innumerable factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those anticipated. As such, these statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, fluctuating market conditions, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from expectations and should not be relied upon. Whether or how the customer utilizes any such information is entirely its responsibility (for which it assumes the entire risk).

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...